Study for the Texas Surveyors Exam with comprehensive quizzes and multiple-choice questions designed to enhance your knowledge and skills. Prepare effectively with helpful hints and detailed explanations tailored for success on your exam!

Practice this question and more.


In Turner v. Smith, what prevailed regarding suppositious calls?

  1. They always hold legal weight

  2. They will not prevail

  3. They can be re-established by surveyors

  4. They are only valid if documented

The correct answer is: They will not prevail

In the case of Turner v. Smith, the court determined that suppositious calls do not hold legal weight in matters of land surveying and property boundaries. Suppositious calls refer to indications or references in property descriptions that are based on assumptions or hypothetical scenarios rather than actual measurements or verified data. This ruling emphasizes the importance of relying on accurate, factual information when establishing property lines or boundaries. The understanding of the case indicates that if calls are unsupported by factual evidence or measurements, they will not prevail in legal disputes, which aligns with the need for precision and reliability in surveying practices. This support reinforces the principle that legal determinations regarding property must be based on established facts rather than assumptions that can vary in interpretation.